Destruction of the space shuttle Columbia by two UFOs
(bilingual, in English and
Polish )
Updated:
15 July 2013
Click "X" or "No" on e.g. messages of supposed errors, or on advertisements, if these try to interrupt your viewing of this web page.
Here
is the list of all web pages which should
be available at this address (i.e. from this
server), arranged by language (in 8 languages).
It represents a more frequently updated version
of "Menu 1". Choose below the page that interests
you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
web page to run it:
(The same list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 2.)
Here is the list of addresses of all
totaliztic web sites that still worked
at the date of the most recent update
of this web page. At each of these addresses
should be available all totaliztic web pages
listed in "Menu 1" or
"Menu 2",
including also their different language versions
(i.e. versions in languages:
Polish, English, German, French, Spanish, Italian,
Greek or Russian.) Thus firstly select
the address which you wish to open by dragging
scroll bars in small window below, then click on
this address to run it. When opens the web
page which represents this address, then choose
from its "Manu 1" or
"Menu 2"
the web page which interests you and click on it
to view that page:
(The above list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 4.)
Welcome to my web page which presents a body of evidence
in support of the very shocking for some people fact, that the
space shuttle "Columbia"
was destroyed intentionally by "simulations" of UFO vehicles -
similarly as "simulations" of UFO vehicles destroyed also intentionally
"WTC" skyscrapers from New York.
Thus, the body of evidence presented here provides another
confirmation for the merit of main thesis from the web page
evil.htm -
which (thesis) states that the humanity is currently
tormented and annihilated in a hidden manner by "simulations"
of UFOnauts who look identically to people. (The best
brief description of very important reasons why UFOnauts
are "simulated", and why they are tormenting humans, is
provided in items #L1 to #L5 from the web page named
"magnocraft.htm".)
Furthermore, this body of evidence additionally complements
and extends similar documentation from another web site named
26th day.
This another web site indicates, amongst others, that the tragic
tsunami from the Indian Ocean which occurred on 26 December
2004 and which killed around 300 000 people, was also
induced on purpose by "simulations" of UFOnauts - to become
another example in their continuous efforts to illustrate to
the humanity how departures from principles of pedantic fulfilment of
morality
lead to the destruction and to tormenting of people.
* * *
Everything
that is presented on this web page results from my personal
research carried out on the basis of theory of a magnetically
propelled spaceship of my own invention, called the
"Magnocraft"
More about this spaceship is explained on a separate web
page, which in
"Menu 2" or
"Menu 4"
is accessible under the name of
"Magnocraft".
In turn descriptions of the murderous campaign of tormenting
humanity, which UFOnauts carry out on Earth lately,
are contained in subsections A3 and O8.2 from
volumes (respectively) 1 and 12 of monograph [1/4],
and also on a naumber of separate web pages, such as
evil,
landslips,
Katowice,
Katrina,
tornado,
26th day,
WTC,
Columbia,
changelings,
plague, and
predators.
Here are headings portraying to subsequent
categories of evidence
in support of my thesis that UFOs destroyed the space
shuttle Columbia, and also my explanations provided
directly under these headings.
#1.
What really destroyed the space shuttle "Columbia":
It is officially claimed, that the space shuttle
"Columbia" was destroyed by a piece of
"foam" that separated during the take off. For these people who
do not believe in the official explanation, an alternative "natural"
explanation was created, i.e. the one which carefully avoids
using the word "UFO". According to this alternative explanation,
the space shuttle Columbia was destroyed by a powerful
lightning (named "Megalightning"). However, the truth in fact is
still another. Namely in reality the space shuttle Columbia
was intentionally destroyed by UFOnauts. UFOnauts carried
out this destruction to accomplish several goals. For example,
they used it to introduce the atmosphere of threat and
danger to space research (UFOnauts accomplished this goal
very well). The destruction of Columbia was also a component
of a multi-frontal attack of UFOnauts on humanity, which
is aimed at the complete wiping out our present technical
civilization on Earth. (This attack of UFOnauts on humanity
is described in more details on separate web pages
named
predators,
26th day, and
evil,
which can be viewed via
"Menu 2" or
"Menu 4" .)
Below, on the photograph marked "Fig. #1", discussed is
an example of the most significant photographic evidence
which confirms the direct involvement of UFOs in
destruction of the space shuttle Columbia.
* * *
Notice that you can see the enlargement
of each illustration from this web site, simply by clicking
on this illustration. Most of the Internet browsers that you may use,
allow also to download each
illustration to your own computer, and then look at it, reduce or
enlarge the size of it, or print it, with your own graphical software.
(How to accomplish this downloading, it is explained on a separate
web page which is run from "Menu 1" under the name
"replicate ".)
* * *
If one wishes to shift
a given Figure (i.e. a photograph or a drawing) -
means if one wishes to move this Figure into
another part of the screen where e.g. a description
of it is located, and when simultaneously one
wishes to reduce or reconfigure the separate window
in which this illustration is to appear, then one needs
to do as follows: (1) click on this illustration to make
it appear in another new window, (2) make sure
that this new window is set for capability to be
reconfigured and shifting along the screen (for
this one needs to have a look at the middle square
out of the three squares present in the top-right
corner of the screen - this middle square should
contain inside just a single screen-icon, so if there
are two such screen-icons inside of it, then one
needs to click on them to turn them into a single
screen-icon), (3) the "downsize" or "reconfigure"
this another new window (with a given illustration)
through "grabbing" its right-bottom corner with the
mouse and then dragging this corner upwards-left
to receive the required size and configuration of
this different new window (notice that since this
new window is downsized or reconfigured, then
it is to stay this way for all next Figures being
clicked - unless one enlarges or reconfigures
the window again), and then (4) drag this another
new window with the Figure that one wishes to
relocate, to the area of the web page where
one wishes to look at it e.g. because there is
a description related to it (to move the new window
with a Figure, one needs to just grab it with the
mouse by the blue stripe on the top of it and then
drag it to the required place). Notice also that if
one scrolls (with scroll-bars) the text of a page
when one reads it, this another window (with the
illustration) is going to disappear. In order to
return it into the new position on the screen, one
needs to click on its "icon" (i.e. on the "program's
button" from the taskbar) in the lowest part of the
screen.
Fig. #1: UFOnauts caught red-handed!
Here is my artistic illustration which I prepared
to explain a highly evidential photograph. This
photograph managed to capture the preparation
of a UFO vehicle for downing the space shuttle
Columbia.
The most vital section of the above illustration shows
how the first UFO vehicle approaches the Columbia
shuttle. I framed this vital section with a broken line
and marked with the symbol "Photo". It is this section
that was captured on a photograph and then widely
disseminated throughout the world in the form of
a photograph. I found an information in Internet that
this highly evidential photograph was taken by an
amateur astronomer from San Francisco, Peter Goldie.
His photograph is possible to find easily in internet with
the use of search engines, after one provides keywords
"lightning bolt",
or some other words referring to the description of it,
e.g. "taken in San Francisco on February 1, 2003 during
the Columbia Shuttle re-entry", or keywords which refer to
the dissemination of this photograph by the TV programme
"Megalightning" (credit: David Monaghan Productions/HTV
West) -
click here to see this photograph.
As the reader can find out this, his photograph does not
differ much from the framed section of my artistic illustration
shown above. Almost the only matter which is drastically
different, is that the stepped trajectory of the UFO and
the straight (like a flight of bullet) trajectory of
Columbia, on the photograph come out as trails
of light painted on the background of black sky.
The above illustration shows how a UFO vehicle lurked
near the predicted trajectory of the space shuttle Columbia.
(The straight like a bullet trajectory of the space shuttle
is marked with the symbol "Columbia" on the above
illustration. In turn the place where the first UFO vehicle
lurked is marked with the symbol "UFO". Please
notice the stepped trajectory of this UFO before it
clings in the point marked "X" to the side of Columbia.)
When the Columbia passed by this UFO, the
extraterrestrial spaceship approached the shuttle
along a stepped trajectory. Then, starting from the
point marked "X", it flew together with the shuttle.
Behind the area captured on the photograph, another
UFO, on the above illustration marked "UFO 2",
approached the shuttle from another side in a similar
manner. Soon afterwards both UFO vehicles managed
to tear the shuttle apart - as it is described on this
web page.
A popular saying goes that "God assigns a witness
to practically every crime". Whatever this witness
does later, it defines whether a given crime is solved.
The photograph illustrated above was taken just by
such a witness which was assigned by God to record
the crime committed by UFOnauts on the space
shuttle "Columbia". This witness served humanity well
by disseminating this photograph throughout the
world. The photograph managed to capture a moment,
when a UFO vehicle - which lurked along the trajectory
of Columbia, flies to this vehicle and clings to it,
in order to later initiate the destruction sequence
described in further items of this web page. It is
pity that copyright laws do not have clauses
which would restrict their power in cases like this
one - i.e. when the publishing of a given photograph
lies in the interest of security of the human race.
Then I could show here this highly evidential photograph.
In turn the present formulation of copyright laws
support interests of UFOnauts instead of serving
humanity. This is because the laws suppress
effectively the dissemination of evidence about
evil activities of UFOnauts on Earth.
UFOnauts have a nasty habit that they always destroy
the evidential value of everything that discloses their
evil activities on Earth. This is because of this habit
that it is so difficult for humanity to work out that we
are occupied, robbed, and destroyed by our
own relatives from UFOs - as this is explained
on the web page
"evil".
Of course, when the highly evidential photograph
discussed here appeared in Internet, and it illustrated
that the downing of the Columbia was carried out by
a UFO vehicle, then immediately a pack of
"changelings"
started to undermine the evidential value of it.
The first form of this undermining was, that
"experts" probably representing UFOnauts, who checked
this photograph, supposedly officially concluded that
it originates from a wobble of camera at the time
of taking this photo. Of course, this is an extremely
shallow explanation, about which I am not able to
understand how it could be conceived by an "expert"
who usually is paid for everyday use of logic. (Unless
this "expert" was in fact a UFOnaut who mainly was
concerned about taking care of interests of UFOnauts
on Earth.) After all, if the camera really was wobbled,
then also the straight trajectory of the space shuttle
Columbia should come out on the photo curved and
crooked. But the space shuttle moves in a straight
line on this photo.
When this first claim (that the photograph discussed
here is only a wobbling of the camera) failed to work
for UFOnauts, they invented another trick to undermine
the evidential value of it. Namely, they coined and
disseminated an explanation, that the photograph
captured a super powerful lightning which hit the
shuttle in an initial stage of landing. This explanation
become later a kernel for an article entitled "Columbia
downed by Megalightning", which on 25 February
2005 was available in Internet, amongst others on
the web page addressed
"www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=cc6y424y.
But also this explanation of the mysterious zigzag,
claiming that it is a lightning, does not hold the
water. After all, if one analyses the photograph,
it is visible that whatever created this zigzag, later
stuck to the space shuttle Columbia and then flew
together with the shuttle. However, if it would be a
lightning, then after striking it would diminish, or
would continue the zigzag path. Furthermore,
a lightning usually has either a sharp, pointer
beginning, or it converges from several smaller
sparks. Means lightning does NOT assumes the
shape of a discoidal UFO vehicle that is well visible
at the very beginning of the zigzag. So the only correct
explanation, as to what actually was captured on the
photograph discussed here, is the explanation that is
published in subsection O8.2 from volume 12 of my
monograph [1/4]
since the destruction of this space shuttle on
Saturday, 1 February 2003. (Notice that my
monograph [1/4] can be downloaded free of
charge from this web site, and also from
numerous other web sites listed in "Menu 4".)
This my explanation states, that the space
shuttle Columbia was attacked by two UFO
vehicles, one of which was captured on the
photograph. After clinging to the space
shuttle, these two UFO vehicles destroyed it
in quite an unique, magnetic, manner. Although
for the presentation of evidence in support of
this my explanation I devoted the rest of this
entire web page, at this point I would like to
direct the reader's attention at the photograph
"Fig. #2" presented below. This is because it
reveals that motion of UFO vehicles on the
background of a dark sky actually do leave
on photographs just such glowing trajectories
as the one captured on the photograph discussed here.
Furthermore, as this is explained in subsection
F6 from volume 3 of monograph [1/4], and also
is confirmed by countless UFO sightings, in case
when a UFO vehicle is forced to move in an
inconvenient direction, the automatic pilot of
it steers along quite a zigzag, stepped-like
path, very similar to the zigzag path captured
on the above photograph.
* * *
Fig. #2: Two basic versions of typical glowing trajectories left
at nights on a film by moving UFO vehicles. Such
trajectories are registered on photographs taken from
motionless cameras with long times of exposure.
(Notice also that trees visible on this photograph have
sharp outlines. This means that the glowing trajectories
captured on this photo are actually caused by motion
of UFOs, NOT e.g. by wobbling the camera.)
The above photograph shows glowing trajectories of
two UFO vehicles that were controlled in two different
manners. The upper UFO vehicle was hand-piloted.
Therefore it smoothly encircled several large circles,
leaving behind very smooth, gently curving glowing
trajectory. In turn the lower UFO vehicle was piloted
by an autopilot. Therefore it moves in a "stepped"
manner, along several straight lines joined together
through angles equal to almost 90 degrees. This
lower "stepped" trajectory is very typical for flights
of UFOs controlled by their autopilots. It is reported
by countless eye-witnesses of these vehicles, and
also registered on numerous photographs. In this
case it confirms, that on the previous photograph
from "Fig. #1", in fact such a glowing trail left by an
ambushing UFO vehicle controlled by an automatic
pilot is shown. This UFO vehicle from "Fig. #1" firstly
lurked along the expected trajectory of the space shuttle,
then it approached the shuttle from below to subsequently
initiate the destruction of Columbia. (Notice that
at the time of this lurking for arrival of the space
shuttle, the UFO vehicle from "Fig. #1" left a
characteristic outline of a discoidal UFO, which is
clearly visible at the very beginning of the zigzag
trajectory of this UFO.)
It is also
worth to know, that a significant number of photographs
showing such typical glowing trajectories formed at nights
by motion of glowing UFO vehicles, is published in an
excellent book which in volume 13 of monograph
[1/4] is marked with the symbol [1P2]. This book
[1P2] carries the following editorial details:
Adolf Schneider, Hubert Malthaner: "Das Geheimnis
der unbeakannten Flugobjekte" (means: "The secret
of the unidentified flying objects"), Hermann
Bauer Verlag KG Freiburg im Breisgau, West Germany,
1976, ISBN 3 7626 0197 6.
#2.
Why
UFOs
are repetitively eliminated from consideration of causes for the destruction of Columbia:
As it is explained in more details on the
internet web page named
God,
available via
"Menu 2" or
"Menu 4" ,
UFOnauts are "simulated" as if they very close
relatives of the mankind, and as if they originate
from exactly the same mother planet "Terra" that
the mankind does. The appearance of several
races of UFOnauts is "simulated" to actually look
exactly like people do. The similarity of some of
them to people is so huge, that when they mix with
the crowd on Earth, they cannot be recognized.
In fact if a UFOnaut is our colleague from the
office, our neighbour, our superior, or the leader
of our country, apart from himself, and also apart
from other UFOnauts, no-one else - in this number
also people who interact with him everyday, would be able to discover
that he is NOT a human. Unfortunately, in the last stage of their
evolution, the civilization of UFOnauts
degenerated morally.
So instead of working to sustain themselves, UFOnauts started
to lead a life of "cosmic bandits and robbers"
who have an enormously advanced knowledge and technology in their
disposal, but who are completely rotten morally. This confederation
of morally decadent relatives of humans with the elapse of time
took a control over Earth, and presently exploits, oppresses, and torments
humanity ruthlessly, although in an invisible manner. In present times
we know them under the name of "UFOnauts". However, because of
their immoral behaviour, cunningness, explosiveness, anger, ruthlessness,
and wild cruelty, past people used to call them "devils".
To what (hidden) kinds of actions these diabolic UFOnauts are
capable, it is explained on separate web pages named
"26th day", and
"UFOnauts".
Because - as the Bible prophesised this for a long time, the tormented
humanity just approaches times when it is able to throw out these
blood-sucking UFOnauts from its back, these UFOnauts decided
to disallow humanity to gain the freedom from their oppression.
Therefore, they designed an entire chain of apparently "natural"
catastrophes, which are aimed at the complete wiping out
technical civilization on Earth. The destruction of the Columbia
space shuttle was a vital propaganda component of this murderous
chain.
Because UFOnauts
in the invisible manner control with an iron hand everything
that happens on Earth, of course they do not allow people
to officially consider the involvement of UFOs in any event.
After all, in order to exploit humanity effectively, UFOnauts
must remain unrecognised to humans. In turn because
UFOnauts do not exist officially, formally no-one on the
position of responsibility has the courage to even consider
them as the cause of any event on Earth. After all, if someone
considers them, and this come out to the public knowledge,
than such someone would immediately loose the job (in a
similar manner as I lost my job already several times because
of my involvement in serious UFO research - for details see
subsection A4 from volume 1 of my monograph [1/4]). It
concerns also these events, in which the involvement of
UFOs is obvious and immediately hits our eyes (e.g. as
this is the case with destruction of the space shuttle
Columbia described on this web page, or with evaporation
of WTC buildings in New York, or with tsunami induced
by UFOs which on 26 December 2004 murdered around
300 000 people - for details see a separate web page
"26th day").
Further facts on the
topics addressed here are provided in subsections A3 and O8.1
from volumes (respectively) 1 and 12 of the scientific monograph
[1/4], the free copies of which can be downloaded from the item
"Monograph [1/4]"
in "Menu 1" or "Menu 4" on the left margin of this web page.
Fig. #3: A so-called "crop circle" formed by a landed
cluster of UFOs in crops of England - for details
see "Fig. M13h" from my
monograph [1e]
(in English). It illustrates only another category in a
multitude of material evidence which proves the
continuous, although well hidden, interference of
UFOnauts and UFO vehicles in human affairs. As this
is explained comprehensively in subsection VB4.3.1 from
volume 17 of my slightly older
monograph [1/4],
in order to hide these crop circles from people, UFOnauts
invented and disseminated via devoted human helpers,
an entire ocean of explanations. In this manner they
implemented their typical strategy of hiding evidence,
which in a best manner is expressed by their own saying,
that "if you wish to hide a tree, you need to plant a forest
around it". As we all know jolly well, this strategy works perfectly.
By using it constantly, UFOnauts managed to disseminate
amongst people a multitude of "natural" explanations
for these crop circles, none of which mentions the
involvement of UFOs in the formation of these marks.
And all these explanations are tolerated by people
in spite that theory behind the space vehicle
named the
"magnocraft"
explains exactly what is the real origin of these
crop circles (and also the real origin of other
material evidence for the continuous activity of
UFOnauts on Earth). If
anyone manages to separate his/her views from
these imposed on us by UFOnauts, then it turns
out that the origin of these crop circles is very
simple - as this is explained in details on the
next "Fig. #4". This is because crop circles are
formed by spinning magnetic circuits of (usually
invisible for human sight) UFO vehicles that
landed in a given crop field. One of such
UFO vehicle invisible to people, which was
lurked on a "crop circle" similar to the
above one, was even photographed in Poland.
It is shown on a number of web pages accessible
via "Menu 2" and "Menu 4", e.g. on pages:
"Telekinezis",
"Time vehicles",
"UFO", or
"Text [4c]: 1, "
(see Figure "Z_2_B2" on these web pages - it was
originally published in the Polish treatise [4c]).
#3.
The strategy of UFOnauts: "is you try to hide a tree, you need to plant a forest around it":
In their efforts of hiding all evidence which
originates from their activities on Earth,
UFOnauts follow the general principle "if you
wish to hide a tree, you need to plant an entire
forest around it". Therefore, also in case of
destruction of the space shuttle Columbia
by two UFOs, as well as in all other cases of leaving
material evidence on Earth, UFOnauts concentrate
on multiplying "orthodox explanations", each
single one of which carefully avoids mentioning
the involvement of UFOs in creation of a given
piece of evidence. And so, the destruction of space shuttle
Columbia officially is attributed to a piece of
"foam" which drop out during a take off. But to
these people who do not believe in this official
explanation, already another orthodox explanation
was prepared, which is based on an apparent hitting
of the space shuttle by a powerful lightning.
Soon probably further such explanations are going
to appear, which will be inspired by UFOnauts
themselves, and none of which will even mention
the word "UFO".
Fig. #4: Here is "Figure F13" from volume 3 of my slightly older
monograph [1/4].
It explains how a landing cluster of UFOs forms in crops a landing site
with shape shown on the previous photograph marked "Fig. #3".
Illustrated is a cluster of UFOs formed from two separate
spherical complexes of K6 type UFOs. As this can be seen on the
above Figure, such a cluster of UFO vehicles, is surrounded with
invisible to human eyes strands of magnetic field force lines.
These strands are passing from outlets of some propulsors
to inlets of other (or the same) propulsors (see the explanation
of magnetic field as a circulating stream of counter-matter
provided in subsection H5.2 from volume 4 of monograph [1/4]).
In volume 3 of monograph [1/4] such strands of force lines
of magnetic field that surround UFO vehicles, are called
"magnetic circuits" of these vehicles. These magnetic circuits
can be put into rotation by the propulsion system of a given
UFO. Some of them rotate around peripherals of one (or both)
discoidal UFO vehicles, while others are rotating just around
their own axes of rotation. In turn, when these magnetic
circuits rotate, then after descending of UFOs close to a
crop field (on the above Figure the surface of this crop
field is marked with the line "G-G"), these rotating strands
of magnetic field force lines, similarly like brushes of
invisible brooms, brush towards the ground each single
blade of grass. Thus they form very characteristic shape
of a UFO landing site. In this landing site every kind of
magnetic circuits produces a different and very characteristic
mark. The above illustration shows which magnetic circuits
from a cluster of UFOs are responsible for the formation
of which marks in crops. Of course, UFO clusters of
difference shapes and compositions will form different
shapes of landing sites in crops. Names of subsequent
magnetic circuits, and also their function in UFO clusters,
are described more comprehensively in subsection F3.1.6
from volume 3 of monograph [1/4], the free copies of which
can be downloaded, amongst others, from this web site, or
from other sites listed in
"Menu 4".
#4.
What course took the destruction of Columbia by UFOs:
Let us start the evidential part of this web
page from describing how most probably two UFO vehicles
belonging to the bandit civilization that occupies Earth, destroyed
the Columbia space shuttle. (Notice that the photograph from
"Fig. #1" presents the approach of only first of these two UFO
vehicles - the second UFO vehicle probably approached the
space shuttle Columbia slightly later, already beyond the frame
from "Fig. #1".) On Saturday, 1 February 2003, around 7:50 CST,
when the Columbia space shuttle initiated the landing, two UFO
vehicles from a bandit civilisation lurked along the predicted
trajectory of it. When the shuttle passed by these UFO vehicles,
each one of them approached the shuttle from the opposite side.
Because the direction of the flight of the space shuttle was
slanted in relationship
to the course of force lines of Earth's magnetic field, in order to
maintain the same direction of flight as the shuttle did, both UFO
vehicles needed to fly in the magnetic whirl mode of operation
that is described in subsection F6.3 from volume 3 of monograph
[1/4]. It was this magnetic whirl which caused that one of these two
UFO vehicles was recorded on a photograph from "Fig. #1". The
powerful glow of these two UFOs surrounded by a magnetic
whirl, caused that both vehicles were also seen by numerous
eye witnesses - see item #8 below. Furthermore, in spite that
these UFOs oriented themselves in relationship to the shuttle,
so that astronauts sitting in the shuttle could not notice their
presence, the close proximity of UFOs was noticed by temperature
gauges of the shuttle. After all, the magnetic whirl of UFOs
induced powerful eddy currents in metallic parts of the shuttle,
while these currents lifted rapidly the temperature that was
registered by gauges. At 7:52 these sensors reported to Earth
the first increase of temperature caused by the approach of two
UFOs. Initially UFO vehicles tried to turn the heavy space shuttle
with its side towards the direction of flight. UFOnauts knew,
that the thermal screen of the shuttle works just only for the frontal
flight. During a side flight the protection would not work. But around
7:59 CST, automatic pilot of the shuttle fired correction engines,
thus neutralizing this attempt of UFOnauts. In face of inability to
turn the shuttle sideways and to cause its self-destruction, UFOnauts
used the proven in action method of destroying our flying vehicles.
So they switched on the full power of their magnetic field, thus
destroying completely the communication devices and electronics
installed on the shuttle. Then UFOs switched on the full power of
magnetic whirl. This whirl, on the principle of an "inductive shield"
described in subsection F10.1 from volume 3 of monograph [1/4],
changed the metal of the shuttle into explosives. The shuttle started
to disintegrate, while the thrusting debris started to be deflected into
a shape of a flat fan by magnetic field of both UFOs. The rest we
know from the press and television.
Of course, many people
may ask, how it happens that NASA has not noted so obvious action
of UFOs. After all, two UFO vehicles manoeuvring near shuttle were
noticed even by eye witnesses. (Unfortunately later interpreted as
debris earlier separated from the shuttle.) The answer is simple.
UFOnauts on purpose suggested to NASA an erroneous line of
thinking, by causing that during a lift off some non-significant pieces
of thermal insulation fell off from the external tank and hit wings of the
shuttle. In the result, instead of looking for real reasons of the catastrophe,
investigation of NASA concentrated exclusively on finding a connection
between these falling insulation and the catastrophe of the shuttle.
Even the director of the program stated, quote: "We're making the
assumption from the start that the external tank was the root cause
of the problem that lost Columbia." - see the article [1O8.2] "NASA
looking for the missing link" published on page B16 of the newspaper
"New Straits Times"
(Malaysia), Wednesday, 5 February 2003). Of course, according to
the Polish proverb "when one wished to hit a dog, a stick always can
be found" (in Polish: "kiedy ktos chce uderzyc psa, kij zawsze sie
znajdzie"), because of the lack of different lines of thinking, and
because concentration exclusively on this suggested by NASA
erroneous direction, there was no option but to find this connection.
After all, in such situations helpful UFOnauts always provide the
required piece of evidence. In turn, if someone does not even
consider the possibility, which contains truth, what chances such
someone has in establishing where this truth lies.
Let us now proceed with
listing of evidence which I managed to identify, and which in my
opinion documents that it were two UFOs which caused the explosion
of the Columbia space shuttle. Here are the most vital components
of this evidence.
#5.
Signals of the overheating of the shuttle:
The principle which UFOs finally use to destroy
the Columbia shuttle, is based on the action of
magnetic whirl described in subsection F10.1 from volume 3 of
monograph [1/4]. Such a whirl causes a rapid boiling of metals
in their entire volume, and thus it turns these metals into
explosives. Unfortunately for UFOnauts, such whirl leaves also
very characteristic marks. One group of these marks are holes
and pores that later are present in the metal evaporated by
such a magnetic whirl from a UFO. Another such a mark
is simultaneous increase of temperature in the entire volume of
metallic parts of the shuttle. And actually, shortly before the problems
started on the shuttle, all sensors of the shuttle in fact did notice a
rapid and simultaneous increase of temperature. This is a clear
evidence that the magnetic whirl of UFOs really acted in there.
This is because if the shuttle disintegrated e.g. because of the
destruction of a thermal screen, then the growth of temperature
initially would need to appear in this area of the Columbia,
where the screen failed.
#6.
The blocking of radio communication:
This blocking also appeared on the space
shuttle Columbia. Actually it make the communication of
the shuttle with Earth impossible since the first moment when UFOs
switched on the action of their "inductive shield". This blocking is
excellently known from all other attacks of UFOs. For example,
it appeared during the evaporation of the WTC skyscrapers by
UFOs - as I described this in subsection O8.1 from volume 12
of monograph [1/4]. It also appeared during the attack of UFOs
on a Russian TU154 - also described in subsection O8.1 from
[1/4]. I should not need to even mention here that the disappearance
of radio communication is a first sign of a nearby presence of UFOs
in all UFO abductions - as this is well documented in UFO literature.
The blockage of radio
communication between the shuttle and Earth confirms in many
ways the intentional attack of a UFO. Firstly, if the shuttle
would really disintegrate because of the breaking of insulation,
then such blockage of radio signals should not appear at all.
In reality communication devices of the space shuttle are so
well designed, extensively protected, and have such independent
electricity supply and backup systems, that in normal circumstances
they should work and transmit data even after the shuttle
disintegrated into pieces.
So in normal cases, some debris from the shuttle should still
transmit their data until the moment they hit the ground.
Secondly, this loss of the communication took place before
the shuttle received a major hit from the Earth's atmosphere.
So if one puts the blame onto supposed falling off the ceramic
insulation, then this loss of communication had no rights to
occur as early as it did.
#7.
Holes and bubbles in debris from the shuttle Columbia:
When debris from the shuttle were shown
in TV, my first task was to establish whether they have
the characteristic holes, and bubbles, that appear when a metal is
evaporated by a magnetic field from a UFO. (A detailed description what
causes these bubbles and holes, and what is their mechanism of
formation, is contained in subsections F10.1 and P2.7 from (respectively)
volumes 3 and 13 of monograph [1/4].) And in fact, almost on each
metal debris from the shuttle, the close up of which they show in TV,
these holes and bubbles were clearly noticeable. These holes and
bubbles are also clearly visible on a photo of a fragment of the shuttle,
that was published in [2O8.2] Malaysian newspaper
"New Straits Times",
issue dated on Monday, February 3, 2003, page B18. In this aspect
the debris from Columbia were identical to debris from the Russian
airplane TU154 described in subsection O8.1 from volume 12 of
monograph [1/4].
#8.
Eye witnesses' observation of two UFO vehicles that flew parallel to the Columbia shuttle:
Amongst many reports of eye witnesses on
the explosion of Columbia, the most evidential was the
report of someone called Gary Hunziker. It was published, amongst
others, on [3O8.2] the last page (no 20) in the Malaysian newspaper
"New Sunday Times",
issue dated on Saturday, 2 February 2003. This person observed
the space shuttle Columbia before it entered the Earth's atmosphere.
Here is the key statement of this report, quote: "I could see two bright
objects flying off each side of it. I just assumed they were chase jets".
Of course, we must remember that chase jets are unable to climb
into cosmos beyond Earth's atmosphere. Furthermore, above the
atmosphere the shuttle could not initiate the disintegration, so these
could not be shuttle's own debris. So these two bright objects were
actually two UFO vehicles that were preparing themselves for the
destruction of the shuttle. (One of these two UFO vehicles was recorded
on the photograph shown previously in "Fig. #1".)
The same two UFO vehicles
flying on both sides of the shuttle Columbia and noticeable so early as
above California, were also observed by many other astronomers
amateurs, who watched the return of the shuttle. A note about these
"upstream debris" is contained in the article [1O8.2] mentioned earlier.
Unfortunately, by experts from NASA these are explained as debris
that fall off the shuttle Columbia much earlier from others. But so-far,
no explanation was given how it is possible that some debris were
torn from the shuttle before the shuttle actually hit the atmosphere.
#9.
The disintegration of the shuttle into the shape of a flat fan:
In normal circumstances, if any object
hitting atmosphere starts to disintegrate, this disintegration has a voluminous
character. This practically means that debris are falling off in all possible
directions, forming in the air a kind of sphere. But metal debris from the
Columbia shuttle all kept breaking apart and deviating horizontally in relationship
to the original direction of flight, while still flying in a single horizontal plane.
So instead of a sphere, they formed a kind of a flat fan-tail. This in turn means,
that some sort of force kept them in the same plane and deflected solely
sideways, without allowing them to be deflected vertically. This force that
spread the metal debris into the shape of a flat fan, were the magnetic circuits
of two UFO vehicles magnetically linked together, which were flying on both
sides of these debris and which pulled them sideways. So the shape of a
flat fan, that was formed by debris of Columbia, and that was seen by many
thousands of eye witnesses, is another item of evidence that almost to the
last moment of their hitting the earth, these debris were kept destroyed by
the vindictive UFOs.
#10.
The "miraculous saving" of the black box with data recordings
from the shuttle's re-entry, or a fabrication of UFOnauts:
On Monday, 9 July 2006, at 9:30 pm to
10:35 pm, in the channel "Prime" of New
Zealand television the documentary
programme entitled "Seconds from
Disaster" was broadcasted, in which
outcomes of investigation into causes
of the Columbia disaster were presented.
As it stemmed from this programme,
all conclusions which the investigating
team reached, were drawn practically
from one source only. This source turned
out to be the so-called "black box" (i.e.
the "re-entry data recorder") which contained
a tape with recordings of data from the
return flight of the shuttle Columbia.
If not this "black box" and not these data,
then the outcomes of the investigation into
the cause of this catastrophe could have
completely different conclusions.
The problem, however, with this "black box" is,
that all facts regarding it indicate that it was
purposely foisted off upon investigators by
UFOnauts, while recordings which were
prepared on the tape that the box contained
were on purpose fabricated by UFOnauts,
so as to indicate immediately a simple
explanation what happened with the shuttle.
After all, UFOnauts have a long tradition in
fabricating the evidence in such a manner
that the responsibility for their crimes is
pushed on someone, or something, else.
Here is the evidence which suggests that the
finding of this "black box", as well as the content
of it , were fabricated on purpose by UFOnauts
in order to distract human investigators from
checking the possibility that these were UFOnauts
who destroyed the shuttle Columbia:
(1)
The place of finding of this "black box".
This "black box", from which later all far-reaching
conclusions were drawn about the causes of the
Columbia disaster, was found in a large forest
clearing. It lied in a clearly visible place which
previously was already searched thoroughly.
The fact of finding it in the place previously searched
and well visible was explained by previous "overlooking"
it. However, we need to also consider that the same
fact can indicate that only after the first search
were finished it was there "purposely foisted off"
upon investigators by UFOnauts.
(2)
The technical state of the "black box".
All debris from the shuttle Columbia after falling
to Earth were burned, broken, and out of order.
But this "black box" was found in the working
order, almost as if it was a new one or straight
from a factory. Also the recordings in it turned
out to be readable and without faults. This fact
of finding it in such a perfect technical state was
explained as a "miracle". However, one also
must take under the consideration that this
"miracle" could simply be a care of UFOnauts,
who purposely foisted off this black box upon
investigators, to reassure that people are able
to decode everything what UFOnauts so laboriously
prepared in it.
(3)
"Afflicted" manner in which this "black box" was
found. With a large interest I viewed the
history of finding this "black box". As it turns
out, the finder of it was "afflicted" by something
to volunteer for searching this box again in the
area which was already searched thoroughly
by a different team. Then again something
"afflicted" him to go into the place where it lied,
in spite that other searchers refused go there.
For me it looks like a telepathic control over
this person exerted by invisible UFOnauts
to make him find the box.
(4)
Unambiguous and meaningful manner with which the
recordings in this black box indicated the causes of
the disaster. In real life truth is always hidden
deeply. In Polish this is well described by a proverb
"prawda na dnie studni się chowa" (i.e. "the truth
is hidden at the bottom of a well" - meaning that in
order to find the truth, according to this proverb one
needs to draw the content of the entire well).
So to establish the truth it is necessary to trace it
laboriously and to overcome numerous obstacles.
However, in the case of this "black box" almost
immediately and without any problems become
obvious what exactly happened and in which
order. Such obvious indications are too improbable
to be anything else than purposeful fabrications.
(5)
Easiness of the experimental confirmation of recordings
from this "black box". Recordings from this "black
box" indicated in which exactly panel of the wing of
Columbia was a hole. After placing this
RCC panel 8
under shots of "foam" samples, in fact a hole was made in it.
All this could be considered convincing,
if not a display of the American magician David
Blaine. In one of his television shows he demonstrated
in sight of many witnesses and checkers how to make
a similar hole without a visible touching the affected
object. If David Blaine could prepare such a hole with
his "trick" without being caught when he did it, means that
a similar hole UFOnauts could prepare with their advanced
technology during experiments with this panel. After all,
the secretive making this hole by UFOnauts in sight of
many witnesses and cameras eliminated UFOnauts
from suspicions that these were them who caused
the Columbia disaster.
* * *
"Auspicious coincidents" sometimes happen in nature.
But as the above indicates it, in case of this
"black box" there were so many of such "favourable
coincidents", that really their coincidental
occurring turns out to be impossible. This
means that the entire case of this black box
was fabricated by UFOnauts. After all, it served
typical for UFOnauts "foisting off upon" investigators
the convenient explanation for crime which
UFOnauts just confirmed.
Of course, the above case of the "manoeuvring"
of the evidence in form of "black box", in my
opinion is just a single one in a long chain of
similar hidden sabotages carried out on Earth
by UFOnauts. For another example of the sabotage
of the same type (in my opinion also prepared
secretly by UFOnauts) can probably be indicated
the unexplained lost of the original film of man's first
step on the Moon. About the disappearance of
this film reported an article "Small oversight for
Nasa a giant loss for mankind" published in the
New Zealand newspaper
"The New Zealand Herald",
issue dated on Tuesday, August 15, 2006,
page B3. By some strange coincidence this
film disappeared in the middle of intense
debate as to whether people in fact were on
the Moon, or rather all this was a propaganda
farce (this debate was induced by a show in
televisions of many countries of the documentary
film "Did man land on the Moon").
#11.
The repetition by UFOs of the same pattern of
destruction that was already used on Russian TU154:
UFOnauts always carry out their attacks with
the methods already proven in action. So these methods
are repeated by them many times. The method of attack used on the
space shuttle Columbia is an exact repetition of a method used on 4
October 2001 on a Russian airplane TU154 with Israeli tourists (this
attack of a UFO on a Russian airliner TU154 is described in more details
in subsection O8.1 from volume 3 of monograph [1/4]). Also in this case,
the destruction of the space shuttle Columbia was most probably done
not by an UFOnaut, but by a human fanatic taught by UFOnauts to pilot
their vehicles. In that way this fanatic took on himself the karma for taking
lives. In order to motivate better this fanatic, a presence of an
Israeli astronaut
on the deck of space shuttle most probably was used.
Also similarly like in case of attack on TU154, UFOnauts
in advance prepared an "scapegoat", which in this case
was insulation from the external tank. It was this "scapegoat"
that was to be blamed for the entire disaster.
One of the repetitive components
in the pattern of attacking people by UFOnauts is, that immediately
after such an attack the access of "unofficial" researchers to the
evidence is cut off. For example, when UFO vehicles evaporated
WTC skyscrapers in New York, as I explained this comprehensively in
subsection O8.1 from volume 12 of monograph [1/4], almost immediately
the entire evidence was melted as scrap iron. Even official researchers
of this catastrophe were complaining then publicly that almost nothing
was left to them for research. When on 26 December 2004 a tsunami
induced by a UFO killed around 300 000 people around coasts of the
Indian Ocean, the access to affected areas was blocked by various
legal, health, and propaganda means. In turn mass media would not
publish almost any scientific facts, apart from stories of survivals.
Similarly also happened immediately after destruction of the Columbia
space shuttle. These people who were caught on even touching debris
fallen from the shuttle, were immediately imprisoned and punished
severely. Soon afterwards these debris disappeared in order to never
be available for research by interested "unofficial" researchers.
It is rather pity, because even myself I would be interested in
examining and documenting these parts of them which carried the
characteristic evidence of the UFO attack.
* * *
For me personally the evidence listed above
is sufficiently meaningful to introduce a certainty, that the destruction
of the Columbia space shuttle, was orchestrated by UFOnauts. The similar
case was also with the majority of catastrophes that plague humanity lately.
I personally believe that the combination of unambiguous evidence as
this presented above, indicates conclusively the direct involvement of
UFOnauts in the downing of the Columbia space shuttle. However, I am
also fully aware, that the present unprecedented domination of UFOnauts
over the views of people on Earth, and also over the situation in our
orthodox scientific institutions, in fact is making impossible any official
consideration of the involvement of extraterrestrials in this tragic event.
#12.
If readers are interested in furthering the deductions and evidence presented here:
Further details and evidence on subjects
addressed here can be find in subsections A3 and
O8.2 from volumes (appropriately) 1 and 12 of the scientific
monograph [1/4], free copies of which can be downloaded
from the item
"Monograph [1/4]"
in "Menu 1" or "Menu 4" on the left margin of this web page.
Topics of occupation of Earth by UFOnauts and our self-defence
against this occupation are discussed continually (but in the
Polish language) on the blog of totalizm which is available
under the Internet address:
totalizm.blox.pl/html/.
Notice that you can also download to
your own computer a replica of this web page, as this is explained on web pages
FAQ - questions and
replicate
available through "Menu 1" and "Menu 2". (In order to download it, you just
need to click in "Menu 1" on the item
source replica of this page.)
#13.
How with the web page named
"skorowidz_links.htm"
one can find totaliztic descriptions
of topics in which he is interested:
A whole array of topics equally interesting
as these from the above web page, is also
discussed from the angle that is unique to
the philosophy of totalizm. All these related
topics can be found and identified with the use of
content index
prepared especially to make easier finding
these web pages and topics. The name "index"
means a list of "key words" usually provided
at the end of textbooks, which allows to find
fast the description or the topic in which we
are interested. My web pages also has such
a content "index" - only that it is additionally
supplied in green
links
which after "clicking" at them with a mouse
immediately open the web page with the topic
that interest the reader. This content "index"
is provided on the web page named
skorowidz_links.htm.
It can be called from the "organising" part of
"Menu 1" of every totaliztic web page. I would
recommend to look at it and to begin using it
systematically - after all it brings closer hundreds
of totaliztic topics which can be of interest to
everyone.
Current email addresses to the author of
this web page, i.e. officially to
Dr Eng. Jan Pajak
while courteously to Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak,
at which readers can post possible comments,
opinions, descriptions, or information which in
their opinion I should learn, are provided on the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm
(for its version in the HTML language), or the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.pdf
(for the version of the web page "pajak_jan_uk.pdf"
in safe PDF format - which safe PDF versions
of further web pages by the author can also be
downloaded via links from item #B1 of the web page named
text_11.htm).
The author's right for the use of courteous
title of "Professor" stems from the custom that
"with professors is like with generals", namely
when someone is
once a professor, than he or she courteously
remains a professor forever. In
turn the author of this web page was a professor
at 4 different universities, i.e. at 3 of them,
from 1 September 1992 untill 31 October 1998,
as an "Associate Professor" from English-based
educational system, while on one university as
a (Full) "Professor" (since 1 March 2007 till
31 December 2007 - means at the last place
of employment in his professional life).
However, please notice that because of my
rather chronic lack of time, I reluctantly
reply to emails which contain JUST time
consuming requests, while simultaneously
they document a complete ignorance of their
author in the topic area which I am researching.
This web page is also available in the form
of a brochure marked [11], which
is prepared in "PDF" ("Portable Document
Format") - currently considered to be the
most safe amongst all internet formats, as
normally viruses cannot cling to PDF. This
clear brochure is ready both, for printing,
as well as for reading from a computer
screen. It also has all its
green links
still active. Thus, if it is read from the computer
screen connected to internet, then after clicking
onto these green links, the linked web pages
and illustrations will open. Unfortunately, because
the volume of it is around a double of the volume
of web page which this brochure publishes,
the memory limitations on a significant number
of free servers which I use, do NOT allow to
offer it from them (so if it does NOT download
from this address, because it is NOT available
on this server, then you should click onto any
other address from
Menu 3,
and then check whether in there it is available).
In order to open this brochure (and/or download
it to own computer), it suffices to either click on
the following green link
or to open from any totaliztic web site the
PDF file named as in the above green link.
If the reader wishes to check, whether some other
totaliztic web page which he or she just is studying,
is also available in the form of such PDF brochure,
then should check whether it is listed amongst links
from "part #B" of the web page named
text_11.htm.
This is because links from there indicate all totaliztic
web pages, which are already published as such
brochures from series [11] in PDF format.
I wish you a fruitful reading!
Jeśli preferujesz czytanie po polsku,
kliknij na polską flagę (if you prefer reading in Polish
click on the Polish flag)
Date of arranging this web page: 5 March 2005
Date of the most recent update of this web page: 15 July 2013
(Check in "Menu 3" whether there is even a more recent update!)
